RCT effect of peri-operative GDHT on cardiac surgery outcomes

Patient Population
Cardiac surgery.

LiDCO Monitor
LiDCOrapid goal-directed therapy (GDT) targeted cardiac index (CI).

Trial Design
Randomised GDT targeted cardiac index vs standard care.

Outcome Impact
Composite endpoint 30-day mortality and major postoperative complications reduced in the goal-directed therapy group (27.4% vs 45.3%) and GDT patients had less infections (12.9% vs 29.7%), a lower incidence of low cardiac output syndrome (6.5% vs 26.6%), reduced ICU (3 vs 5 days) and hospital stay (9 vs 12 days).

OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effects of goal-directed therapy on outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

DESIGN:
A prospective randomised controlled trial and an updated meta-analysis of randomised trials published from inception up to May 1, 2015.

SETTING
Surgical ICU within a tertiary referral university-affiliated teaching hospital.

PATIENTS
One hundred twenty-six high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery or valve repair.

INTERVENTIONS
Patients were randomized to a cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm (goal-directed therapy group, n = 62) or to usual care (n = 64). In the goal-directed therapy arm, a cardiac index of greater than 3 L/min/m was targeted with IV fluids, inotropes, and RBC transfusion starting from cardiopulmonary bypass and ending 8 hours after arrival to the ICU.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of 30-day mortality and major postoperative complications. Patients from the goal-directed therapy group received a greater median (interquartile range) volume of IV fluids than the usual care group (1,000 [625-1,500] vs 500 [500-1,000] mL; p < 0.001], with no differences in the administration of either inotropes or RBC transfusions. The primary outcome was reduced in the goal-directed therapy group (27.4% vs 45.3%; p = 0.037). The goal-directed therapy group had a lower occurrence rate of infection (12.9% vs 29.7%; p = 0.002) and low cardiac output syndrome (6.5% vs 26.6%; p = 0.002). We also observed lower ICU cumulative dosage of dobutamine (12 vs 19 mg/kg; p = 0.003) and a shorter ICU (3 [3-4] vs 5 [4-7] d; p < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (9 [8-16] vs 12 [9-22] d; p = 0.049) in the goal-directed therapy compared with the usual care group. There were no differences in 30-day mortality rates (4.8% vs 9.4%, respectively; p = 0.492). The metaanalysis identified six trials and showed that, when compared with standard treatment, goal-directed therapy reduced the overall rate of complications (goal-directed therapy, 47/410 [11%] vs usual care, 92/415 [22%]; odds ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.26-0.63]; p < 0.0001) and decreased the hospital length of stay (mean difference, -5.44 d; 95% CI, -9.28 to -1.60; p = 0.006) with no difference in post-operative mortality: 9 of 410 (2.2%) versus 15 of 415 (3.6%), odds ratio, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.26-1.47), and p = 0.27.

CONCLUSIONS
Goal-directed therapy using fluids, inotropes, and blood transfusion reduced 30-day major complications in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Osawa EA, Rhodes A, Landoni G, Galas FR, et al. Effect of Perioperative Goal-Directed Hemodynamic Resuscitation Therapy on Outcomes Following Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Systematic Review. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(4):724-33. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001479.

Study showed composite endpoint 30-day mortality and major post-operative complications reduced in the goal-directed therapy group (27.4% vs 45.3%) and GDT patients had less infections (12.9% vs 29.7%), a lower incidence of low cardiac output syndrome (6.5% vs 26.6%), reduced ICU (3 vs 5 days) and hospital stay (9 vs 12 days).

Privacy Preference Center

Close your account?

Your account will be closed and all data will be permanently deleted and cannot be recovered. Are you sure?